http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2009/09/03/internal-gun-locks/ Massad Ayoob on Firearms, Self-defense, and the 2nd Amendment Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:58:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2009/09/03/internal-gun-locks/comment-page-1/#comment-10362 Bull From Wisconsin Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:33:14 +0000 http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/?p=434#comment-10362 I did not read all the replies here but was compelled to comment on legal actions. If an honest citizen ever looses life because of these locks wouldn't the manufacturer be liable? I for one will not buy a modern politically correct desk jockey designed firearm. Lord help us next we will be wearing a safety harness and have an air bag in a fanny pack. If the bureaucratic machine was truly concerned about safety there would ba locking cabinets in the kitchen and bathroom too. I did not read all the replies here but was compelled to comment on legal actions.
If an honest citizen ever looses life because of these locks wouldn’t the manufacturer be liable?
I for one will not buy a modern politically correct desk jockey designed firearm.
Lord help us next we will be wearing a safety harness and have an air bag in a fanny pack.
If the bureaucratic machine was truly concerned about safety there would ba locking cabinets in the kitchen and bathroom too.

]]> http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2009/09/03/internal-gun-locks/comment-page-1/#comment-9052 Internal Lock Failure - Happened to Me? - Page 2 Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:02:28 +0000 http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/?p=434#comment-9052 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2009/09/03/internal-gun-locks/comment-page-1/#comment-7881 luangtom Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:11:15 +0000 http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/?p=434#comment-7881 I think that discussion is good. However, now that S&W offers the same model revolvers with or without the IL, is that not now a point for it not being a major hang-up in any court case where the prosecutor uses its disabling against the defendent? If it is needed, why is S&W now offering the choice of with our without? I think that discussion is good. However, now that S&W offers the same model revolvers with or without the IL, is that not now a point for it not being a major hang-up in any court case where the prosecutor uses its disabling against the defendent? If it is needed, why is S&W now offering the choice of with our without?

]]>